The LMS at We Believe

Last weekend the Latin Mass Society had a presence at the second We Believe Festival, which took place at Oscott Seminary near Birmingham.

Anne Widdecombe, RIP

Me in First Things. It begins:

Widdecombe’s murder has been a tremendous shock to British politics. She was the most prominent British Catholic politician whose faith actually informed her politics—unlike former prime ministers Tony Blair and Boris Johnson, or our presumptive prime minister, Andy Burnham. She converted to Anglicanism in her thirties, and to Catholicism in 1993, and she spent her long political career defending human life and all sorts of causes that she considered just. At the same time, she appeared on numerous television programs and never took herself too seriously. This combination of qualities—a sense of fun, a disinterested commitment to justice, and a powerful supernatural faith—is one that her detractors are completely unable to understand.

Read the whole thing there.

Support the Latin Mass Society

Five Years of Traditionis Custodes

Me in the Catholic Herald: this is the conclusion.

Cardinal Arthur Roche, Prefect of the Dicastery for Divine Worship, will forever be associated with his Dicastery’s explanation of why details of Traditional Masses should be excluded from parish newsletters:

“There is no intention in these provisions to marginalise the faithful who are rooted in the previous form of celebration: they are only meant to remind them that this is a concession to provide for their good (in view of the common use of the one lex orandi of the Roman Rite) and not an opportunity to promote the previous rite.”

If the aim of Traditionis custodes was indeed to marginalise the faithful rooted in the Traditional Mass, then it might be said to have had a measure of success, though this has come at the expense of promoting the “previous rite” by putting a bright spotlight on it. Otherwise it is much more difficult to see what it has achieved, or still might achieve, that Pope Francis and his advisers might actually have wanted to achieve.

It is time for Pope Leo to clear up the mess.

 Read the whole thing there.

Support the Latin Mass Society

LMS Latin Course: photos

For the first time the Latin Mass Society has two Residential Latin Courses in one year, because last year the summer course was over-subscribed. Last week the second of the 2026 courses took place, at the Carmelite Retreat Centre, Boar's Hill near Oxford.



It is a small event, but year by year we have helped a lot of priests, seminarians, and lay people recover their heritage of Latin, and of other aspects of Catholic tradition. Participants have daily Mass, they sing Compline together, and this year we had a Missa cantata for the feast of the Visitation. We had two priests, an Oratorian novice and a young man about to try his vocation with the Institute of the Good Shepherd. Latin students of all abilities should try it out, for an intense week of learning in a relaxed Catholic atmosphere.

A year of Pope Leo: me in Ad Vaticanum

I've written for the first time in the new Catholic news website, Ad Vaticanum.

It begins:

The first question for the Catholic press about a new pope is inevitably where he sits on the ideological spectrum: will he support readers’ causes and punish their opponents? Popes are complicated figures, however, and do not arrive neatly labelled.

The first indication of the Holy Father’s ideological allegiance came before his election, when the journalist Edward Pentin encountered Austin Ivereigh and Fr James Martin SJ in a street in Rome. It was a moment when Cardinal Prevost’s handling of a clerical abuse case in his former diocese in Peru was being discussed in the media, and Ivereigh was upset about this. The encounter, which is described on Pentin’s Substack, suggested that two of the best-known supporters of Pope Francis regarded Prevost as “their man”. His election a few days later was indeed welcomed by many who had been looking for a “continuity candidate” to continue the work of Pope Francis.

Read it all there; there's no paywall.

Support the Latin Mass Society

Walsingham Pilgrimage: call for singers

 

Booking is now open for the LMS Walking Pilgrimage to Walsingham; the 2026 dates are Thursday 27 to Sunday 30 August 2026, and the 'early bird' discount applies until Pentecost Sunday, 24 May.

But before we can welcome 200+ pilgrims, we need to be able to look after them. We need volunteers! Today I am going to talk about singers.

Good Music, along with good food, may be said to power the pilgrimage in its natural aspect. But unlike the food, however good, the music has a significance at the supernatural level as well, because it can also be prayer.

It will be no surprise for readers to hear that a lot of prayers are said on the pilgrimage. Pilgrims are divided into 'chapters' which are small enough for people to hear instructions from the front to the back, with the help of megaphones, and also for collective prayer. When we say the Rosary, we sing it: we have settings of the Hail Mary in English, Latin, and French. We also sing the Litanies of Our Lady, of the Saints, of St Joseph, and of the Sacred Heart. In addition, we sing many popular chants, such as the O filii et filiae (though we sing it better than the guys in the link), vernacular hymns, and when the going gets tough, even some patriotic songs.

We believe the singing is very important and go to a lot of trouble over it. We have a book of all the chants and hymns, often with the music (and other useful prayers and information), the Vademecum Peregrini, which everyone has, and every chapter has a cantor.

Farewell to the Hereditary Peers

I have marked the occasion of the final disappearance of the hereditary peers from the UK's House of Lords with this defence of the hereditary principle.

This is the conclusion:

I have a high regard for democracy, because unless it is unusually corrupt, it makes possible the eviction of unpopular ruling parties without bloodshed, and that counts for a lot. Democratic institutions are regarded as having legitimacy, and elected officials who promised particular things when campaigning for votes are regarded as having a “mandate” to implement them. These are good things which help political systems to function and to overcome all kinds of challenges. But this all works because of the western political tradition, which attributes legitimacy to these things. This tradition is reasonable, but it is not necessary. Things could be done in different ways, and in different times and places they have been done in different ways.

The Homeric tradition regards a warrior elite as having the mandate to rule: perhaps it makes sense that those prepared to die for their community should rule it, and it may make for an efficient and just political system. Other communities, living in other circumstances, may focus on a religious elite, or an intellectually, culturally, or economically preponderant class of one kind or another, as natural rulers. If it works for them, it is not for us to criticise it.

The hereditary principle is characteristic of a pre-modern political system, but if it was reasonable then, there is no sense in which it is in principle wrong now. The test of its legitimacy, in fact, is the degree to which it is part of the political tradition of a community. The hereditary House of Lords has been part of Britain’s, and England’s, political system for at least 800 years, so the case for it is pretty conclusive. 

Read the whole thing there (paywalled).

Support the Latin Mass Society